quieteuphorian
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cf55/5cf55d56576678e042931e48c110a91e138d838c" alt="" quieteuphorian
Joined: July 2, 2012
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Post subject: |
|
|
`While there's certainly been more "buzz" about polyamory in the US--some of it even positive!--and I have heard that there are areas in the western US where it is a bit more socially acceptable, I think it's going to be quite some time before it is generally accepted here, and probably a bit more until there's any sort of supporting legal framework. Part of the problem, of course, is the raving religious lunacy that is, unfortunately, still prevalent here. However, I think there's another big obstacle, which is that even among many more liberal-minded folks, there's a suspicion that either "polyamory = cheating" or "polyamory = instant STD." I also have had the sense for a long time that the word "lifestyle" often attached to polyamory might carry some unwanted baggage. I think when people hear "polyamory lifestyle," they often think of something sordid (and the raving religious nuts don't help that with their constant references to "the homosexual lifestyle"). There's a body of research that seems to point to the possibility that humans aren't naturally monogamous to begin with, but I think US culture in general is a long way from even taking such questions seriously.
|
|